Welcome GuestWho's On:   Guest @ 38.107.179.230  Search | Active Topics | Members | Register | Login | RSS 2.0

[EQ2] Mitigation Formulas Options
Cyanbane
Posted: Monday, May 03, 2010 5:27:10 PM


Rank: Admin
Groups: Administration

Joined: 10/20/2007
Posts: 1,525
Points: 3,139
Steelbadger over at EQ2Flames posted this awesome Mit info:




Quote:
For example, if you had 4000 mitigation and then found an item that had the stat +1% mitigation then you'd see about a 0.75% increase in your survivability.

To work out how much mit your persona window should show you can use this equation:



Where:

G is mit purely on your gear (when naked ie completely unmodified).
M is your total +mit% amount. Entered as a whole number, so if you hve 1.4% on an item you enter 1.4 here.
B is your Defensive Stance worn armour effectiveness bonus (15% for most tanks). So for them it would be 0.15. My Guard has a multiplier of 0.2.
N is the number of items of armour you are wearing, yes, the def stance bonus becomes smaller if you're not wearing all your armour.
Z is a logic point. Make it 1 if you're in Defensive stance, make it 0 if you're not.
P is mitigation from any and all spells/buffs and Personal Advancement choices (you can choose Physical Mitigation instead of Elemental, Noxious or Arcane) Yes, benefit from these is also dictated by number of bits of armour worn.

So far as I'm aware that is ALL of the things that can modify Persona Mitigation.

If you want to turn that number into a Percentage then:



Capped at 75% (0.75)

Where Pmit is the earlier calculated PersonaMitigation value and Y is a correction factor to account for differences in the curve at lower/higher mitigation numbers:




So for Pmit values less than 1720 you want to use the top line for Y, if it is more than 1720 then you want to use the bottom line for Y.




Full post with graphs is over at Flames
Theodoric
Posted: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 6:42:07 AM


Rank: Admin
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/31/2007
Posts: 433
Points: 321
So all I want to know is how important mit really is. I forget the GU where mitigation was in fact mitigated (sorry :) ) at one point.

Higher resist more desirable than higher mit all else being equal?
kotttonmouth
Posted: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 8:32:55 AM


Rank: One of the Main Weird
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/30/2007
Posts: 197
Points: 430
Location: PA, Outside Philadelphia
a little over my head but interesting none the less. :)

Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.2 (NET v2.0) - 9/27/2007
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.

11 queries (0.084 seconds, 41.58%).

yaf_pageload: 0.010
yaf_topic_info: 0.003
yaf_forum_list: 0.004
yaf_forum_listpath: 0.003
yaf_forum_listpath: 0.002
yaf_post_list: 0.019
yaf_usergroup_list: 0.005
yaf_usergroup_list: 0.007
yaf_usergroup_list: 0.008
yaf_active_list: 0.018
yaf_active_listtopic: 0.005

Clicky Web Analytics