Welcome GuestWho's On:   Guest @ 38.107.179.232 Guest @ 123.125.71.111  Search | Active Topics | Members | Register | Login | RSS 2.0

[SOE] 's New Flagship Product Options
Cyanbane
Posted: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 5:09:56 AM


Rank: Admin
Groups: Administration

Joined: 10/20/2007
Posts: 1,525
Points: 3,139
Quote:
This is an exciting opportunity to conceive and lead the game design of our new flagship project and we are looking for a Lead Game Designer to ensure its success!


http://tinyurl.com/bfmvr2

Massively is thinking EQ3? For some reason I can't ride that wave. I am wondering if this is a new IP? What you guys thinking?

Planetside 2? (Planetside was one of the most underrated MMOs of all time imho)..





Rotacidare
Posted: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 6:43:56 AM


Rank: Admin
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/31/2007
Posts: 224
Points: 696
Interesting - I think they need to get their current products out IMO. As to a new flagship - I definitely don't think EQ3 or a Planetside. Probably an original title.

kotttonmouth
Posted: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 6:51:46 AM


Rank: One of the Main Weird
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/30/2007
Posts: 197
Points: 430
Location: PA, Outside Philadelphia
Rotacidare wrote:
Interesting - I think they need to get their current products out IMO. As to a new flagship - I definitely don't think EQ3 or a Planetside. Probably an original title.


I agree they need something new and original.

Lomax
Posted: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 8:16:42 AM


Rank: One of the Main Weird
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/23/2008
Posts: 359
Points: 501
Location: UK, Tonbridge
Interesting, very interesting. As for the game type they have dropped some hints with storyline mentioned and wanting MMO experience so we know for sure its a MMO, I would not actually count in Planetside 2 here as a contender then. I've not played it although I've heard a lot about it, but storyline doesn't seem a criteria for it, that was a game that was just dying for a better 1st person shooter engine as good as it was still.

I'd like to think they will go for EQ3 here, but that's thinking from the heart rather then the head, the only thing that makes me believe it could be is that out of that list I think it looks like only Everquest looks (to me) worthy of producing a new version since it has the following. The timing would be right though since in 3 years time when this new MMO is likely to be launched EQ1 will be looking ancient and EQ2 will certainly be looking a bit old.

One other small bit of news I saw on WoW, one of the lead designers there has left WoW for Blizzards new upcoming MMO, I'm curious too as to what that will be, my guess would be a flop though compared to WoW since I have a feeling WoW is the Harry Potter of MMO's, its good but nothing about it really seems to justify its level of success, it seems to be more of a phenomenon.
valarious
Posted: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 10:19:36 AM


Rank: Completly bathed in our weirdness.
Groups: Member

Joined: 11/1/2007
Posts: 62
Points: 95
They have said multiple times that they made a mistake naming EQ2, they should have gone with something else. I highly doubt it will be EQ3 judging from their previous statements to me personally. Scott Hartsman told me directly..although I was drunk so I could have midheard him. There was also a pretty interesting Oakley company event in progress that we crashed multiple times...ahhh, the good ole days. /drink
Theodoric
Posted: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 6:19:11 PM


Rank: Admin
Groups: Member

Joined: 10/31/2007
Posts: 433
Points: 321
Is the Agency now vaporware? Have not seen or heard anything on this in a while. I agree they may need to go in a new direction.

I just don't know about their outlook however. If they can do no better than they did this generation with what is honestly a superior product then they may never be able to get over their poor perception as a company.

Then again, perhaps it is just the unfortunate event of releasing with the phenomenon that was and is WoW.
Cyanbane
Posted: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 10:16:19 PM


Rank: Admin
Groups: Administration

Joined: 10/20/2007
Posts: 1,525
Points: 3,139
Theodoric wrote:
Is the Agency now vaporware? Have not seen or heard anything on this in a while. I agree they may need to go in a new direction.


It isn't vaporware, I think just delayed a bit.

Lomax
Posted: Monday, June 15, 2009 8:35:34 AM


Rank: One of the Main Weird
Groups: Member

Joined: 7/23/2008
Posts: 359
Points: 501
Location: UK, Tonbridge
Cyanbane wrote:
Theodoric wrote:
Is the Agency now vaporware? Have not seen or heard anything on this in a while. I agree they may need to go in a new direction.


It isn't vaporware, I think just delayed a bit.



Just been doing some digging around the SOE main site, I didn't realise they had so many different locations. The recently deceased MxO was from their Seattle office, and coincidently they just happened to be developing and releasing the Agency from there. Its a guess but it cannot have helped having a big new title coming out of there for MxO's future.

Also looking around the offices the up coming highly anticipated MMO is coming from the Austin office currently responsible for Star Wars Galaxies. Since San Diego offices are responsible for EQ1, EQ2, Vanguard and Free realms I'm wondering if they keep genre's separate here. If so then its pointing to the new MMO being a sci-fi one.

All guesswork, but it really does seem unlikely that they would choose anywhere but the headquarters to launch some sort of EQ3 project from, long term I think the fantasy genre is where the big money is likely to be here, just because WoW is dominating it shouldn't be a reason to avoid it in my opinion. But at the same time the sci-fi side of things seems far less developed, it could be a good move there.

One other thought, Denver has Everquest 1&2, Vanguard, Freerealms and Planetside, but Planetside was missing from the games that MxO players could play for free on their station pass, if SOE were to cancel that with it being the only non sci-fi MMO at their headquarters it could be a strong possibility that the development team there move onto work for EQ3 whatever it maybe.

Any thoughts? Or am I trying to read waaay to much into things here? ;)
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS

Powered by Yet Another Forum.net version 1.9.1.2 (NET v2.0) - 9/27/2007
Copyright © 2003-2006 Yet Another Forum.net. All rights reserved.

16 queries (0.045 seconds, 18.91%).

yaf_pageload: 0.004
yaf_topic_info: 0.003
yaf_forum_list: 0.002
yaf_forum_listpath: 0.002
yaf_forum_listpath: 0.002
yaf_post_list: 0.013
yaf_usergroup_list: 0.002
yaf_usergroup_list: 0.002
yaf_usergroup_list: 0.002
yaf_usergroup_list: 0.002
yaf_usergroup_list: 0.002
yaf_usergroup_list: 0.001
yaf_usergroup_list: 0.001
yaf_usergroup_list: 0.003
yaf_active_list: 0.002
yaf_active_listtopic: 0.002

Clicky Web Analytics